Free Essays on Kozol

Traub’s argument mostly focuses on the fact that as long these children are in such a poverty striken environment that they will constantly struggle to graduate from high school. Even if money is given to these children’s education it will not have much effect if the poverty cycle remains. Bringing early intervention programs, providing better equipment, lower number of students per class, sufficient books and determined upbeat teachers will help but it will not solve the problem. Children are not stupid, when they see the poor environment they live in, they see no hope of leaving for greener pastures. Especially if their family, friends and peers don’t see themselves improving their life styles why should these children be anymore optimistic? Most of these children’s parents are working a lot to support them and are not even around a lot to help their children with school or to keep them properly motivated. Not only is the condition of their schools and home lives not up to par, but the streets they walk on and the town they live in are in horrible shape also. That could heavily discourage a child, because I would bet that the idea of getting home safely is more important then a weekly spelling test. Not to mention sewage overflows and blankets of smoke cover some of these towns. So if these children are not physically healthy it is that much harder for them to function properly on any level. Because these children don’t have suffici! ent medical coverage to seek the needed health care. These children need more then money, they need more then most people can provide. They need to have safety, health, attention and education. Things most of us have had and take for granted, but they don’t. And they also need to see what is outside the poverty stricken boundaries they live so they can see that there is hope for a better life. Kozol’s argument is based on that we give equal amounts of money to all schools then thes... Free Essays on Kozol Free Essays on Kozol Response to Savage Inequalities by Jonathan Kozol In Savage Inequalities, Jonathan Kozol describes the conditions of several of America's public schools. Kozol visited schools in neighborhoods and found that there was a wide disparity in the conditions between the schools in the poorest inner-city communities and schools in the wealthier suburban communities. How can there be such huge differences within the public school system of a country, which claims to provide equal opportunity for all? It becomes obvious to Kozol that many poor children begin their young lives with an education that is far inferior to that of the children who grow up in wealthier communities. Savage Inequalities provides strong evidence of the national oppression that is endemic in the American system. Focusing on the discrepancy in resources between schools that are predominantly Black or Latino (usually inner city) and schools that are predominantly white (usually suburban), Kozol provides case studies and statistics to show some kids are given every oppo rtunity to succeed while others (oppressed nations) are set up to fail. Conditions faced by children are a topic that should be an easy wins for Communists looking to explain to people the need for equality for all. It's hard to imagine someone thinking that a kid, born into circumstances out of his or her control, deserves to suffer poor housing, inadequate healthcare, and substandard education. While there are many who would argue adults "bring it on them," kids clearly have no control over where they are born. But Kozol reports, with great surprise, that he found many white adults making overtly racist arguments about the potential of Black and Latino kids to justify the better funding of the schools in the white neighborhoods. Kozol recalls how these people would have been vilified during the social movements of the 60s, but when he was writing this book, in the early 1990s, these attitudes seeme... Free Essays on Kozol Traub’s argument mostly focuses on the fact that as long these children are in such a poverty striken environment that they will constantly struggle to graduate from high school. Even if money is given to these children’s education it will not have much effect if the poverty cycle remains. Bringing early intervention programs, providing better equipment, lower number of students per class, sufficient books and determined upbeat teachers will help but it will not solve the problem. Children are not stupid, when they see the poor environment they live in, they see no hope of leaving for greener pastures. Especially if their family, friends and peers don’t see themselves improving their life styles why should these children be anymore optimistic? Most of these children’s parents are working a lot to support them and are not even around a lot to help their children with school or to keep them properly motivated. Not only is the condition of their schools and home lives not up to par, but the streets they walk on and the town they live in are in horrible shape also. That could heavily discourage a child, because I would bet that the idea of getting home safely is more important then a weekly spelling test. Not to mention sewage overflows and blankets of smoke cover some of these towns. So if these children are not physically healthy it is that much harder for them to function properly on any level. Because these children don’t have suffici! ent medical coverage to seek the needed health care. These children need more then money, they need more then most people can provide. They need to have safety, health, attention and education. Things most of us have had and take for granted, but they don’t. And they also need to see what is outside the poverty stricken boundaries they live so they can see that there is hope for a better life. Kozol’s argument is based on that we give equal amounts of money to all schools then thes...

The Essay Experts LinkedIn Advice Covered by U.K. Career Blog!

The Essay Experts LinkedIn Advice Covered by U.K. Career Blog! Last Sunday I was interviewed by Luca Rosi, Editorial Manager at Hays, a leading global professional recruiting group based in the U.K., for his career blog, Keeping ahead of the game. I answered 13 questions and Mr. Rosi published 12 of them in two blog articles on December 1 and 2: How to write a KILLER LinkedIn profile 1 and How to write a KILLER LinkedIn profile 2. If you’re curious to read my answers to the questions below, please visit Luca’s blog. You might also like his most recent entry on how to make an impact at an interview! How to write a KILLER LinkedIn profile 1 Has the role of the traditional CV now diminished given the stellar rise of LinkedIn? Is it as simple as uploading my CV and sprinkling a few keywords to make my profile search friendly? What’s the biggest mistake professionals make with their LinkedIn profiles? What three things can I do today to build my personal online brand? Do I really need 500+connections? What can I do to boost my numbers? If I’m unemployed, should I reveal this in my headline for example? How to write a KILLER LinkedIn profile 2 Would you recommend that I upgrade to a premium account to boost my chances of finding a job? What’s the protocol for recommendations? Surely I shouldn’t have to ask Apart from joining groups (the QA section is no longer), how else can I demonstrate my expertise? How regularly should I be sharing updates and do they all have to be related to my industry? Should I be using more of partner applications such as Slideshare? And finally, what’s the best piece of career advice that anyone has given you? What happened to the 13th question and answer? Here it is: The average age of a LinkedIn user is 41. Is this the platform for graduates or first jobbers? BB: Some of those 41-year-olds are recruiters and hiring managers. So absolutely! Also some new features on LinkedIn are more specifically geared toward younger job seekers. Are there questions you want me to answer? Please post them in the comments!